Monday, December 15, 2008

Final Paper: The Female Sex as Radical

As this semester comes to a close, I attempt to compose a final thought structure on all of the components that were given to me throughout this sixteen week period. I was drawn to the aspect of defining the female sex and gender; not only to identify it but to approach the concept with a radical approach. In the movie Sex and The City as well as My Best Friends Wedding, there are certain themes in both that parallel the ideas that were discussed in class. There are facets of empowerment, financial independence, success and power that radiate in these movies, and that are not the social norm for women.
Tamar McDonald book Romantic Comedy: Boy Meets Girl Meets Genre makes a relevant point that “(Romantic Comedies) satisfy because they provide easy, uncomplicated pleasures” (McDonald: 7).When I would watch a movie, I never realized that I enjoyed them immensely because they came with no urge to use my brain cells. As I sat down to watch a classic Julia Roberts movie, and the ultra popular television series Sex and the City, I recognized that it fits into that mold; the mold of the generic love story that has been done once, twice, a million times. In My Best Friends Wedding its plot is centered on Julianne Potter (Julia Roberts), a 27-year-old New York restaurant critic who receives a call from her long-time friend Michael O'Neal .In College, the two made an agreement that if neither of them were married by the time they turned 28, they would marry each other. Three weeks before her 28th birthday, Michael tells her he has fallen in love with and is about to marry a 20-year-old college student from a wealthy family. This causes Julianne to realize she has always been in love with Michael and cannot stand to see him wed another woman.
Sex and The City also allows the viewer to engulf themselves in a guilty pleasure that requires little thought process. Set in New York City, the show focused on four women, three in their mid-thirties and one in her forties. The quirky drama/comedy had multiple continuing story lines and tackled socially relevant issues such as sexually transmitted diseases, safe sex, multiple partners and promiscuity. It specifically examined the lives of big-city professional women in the late 1990s and how changing roles and expectations for women affected the characters.

In both films, the women are extremely successful as well as independent; breaking the mold for the norm. Chris Barker discusses the issues of subjectivity and identity in his book Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice, “The discourse of sex is one that through reception of the acts it guides brings sex into view as a necessary norm. Sex is a construction, but an indisputable one that forms us as subjects and governs the materialization of bodies” (Barker: 238). This particular quote shows relevance to the films because these women were able to break the gender constraints and create their own identity.
McDonald further states that another element of a romantic comedy is there will always be visual characteristics. These characteristics are identifiable in most movies and create a symbol for the particular genre. He states that “Consider the reception within the genre of articles associated with weddings, as well as chocolates, candlelight, beds…” (11). Having a movie’s setting placed predominantly around a wedding shows that love and romance is the main plot; it is a subconscious facet that love is saturated in some aspect throughout the entire movie. Obviously, My Best Friends Wedding is revolved around a wedding, seeing that it is in the title. Sex and the City revolved around the concept of love and what it represents. In the theatrical movie version of Sex and the City, the concept of love is abundant. One of the main characters, Carrie, has been on a conquest of finding true love. One of her main men was “Mr. Big”, and they were constantly falling in and out of love for ten years. Finally, the movie unveils that Carrie and Mr. Big are engaged, and the wedding is shown throughout. However, Carrie’s fairytale wedding is not what she thinks it would be, when Big doesn’t show up to the wedding, leaving her alone at the altar and giving the movie one of it’s most raw moments.
..
One aspect that doesn’t really match up with McDonald theory is “Romantic comedies are boy meets, loses, regains girl” (12). In this particular movie, boy does meet and loose girl, however it is the girl that attempts to regain boy. As stated earlier, the plot revolves Julia Roberts going to profess her undying love to her ex-boyfriend in hopes to break up his wedding. Although it does not fit the perfect mold, there is the same structure just switched sexes at the end. In Sex and The City, there are a plethora of examples where the women are the ones approaching the men, and have male like tendencies. One specific example is when the outgoing, sexually promiscuous Samantha does not want to hold the hand of her boyfriend. She does not want to have public displays of affection and she also does not want engage in such frivolity.


According to Foucault, “Subjectivity is a discursive production… Sexuality was a focal point for the exercise of power and the production of subjectivity in western societies. Subjectivity is coterminous with sexuality since subjects are constituted thought the production of sex and the control of the body” (291). In both scenarios, the women of Sex and The City, as well as Julia Roberts in My Best Friends Wedding use their sexual drive to positively get ahead in life. Not in a domineering way, just to use the assets they were given in the proper time and place. Whether it is to achieve an aspect of success, or to achieve a new beau, these women embrace their sexuality.
Everyone wants to have hoped that someday they soon will find true love. Perhaps that is the lure of romantic comedies; they offer the insight and fantasy of finding your soul mate but is it realistic? McDonald says that “In giving the audience a high degree of closure with the happy ending in films of this genre, are romantic comedies benign, supplying an on-screen fantasy of perpetual bliss usually lacking in real life?” (14). One aspect I enjoyed about My Best Friend’s Wedding ,is the movies did not end up in the usual fairy tale happy ending. When Julia Roberts character finally musters up enough courage to tell Michael how much she wants to be with him, the audience feels like it will end up the “normal” way. However, Michael ends up marrying his 20-something fiancĂ©, leaving Julia Roberts embarrassed and alone; which doesn’t happen normally. I really liked that even though she didn’t end up with her “prince”, she still stood up for what she believed in and she received closure.
Another characteristic that needs to be considered is that My Best Friends Wedding as well as Sex and the City are quite radical. The definition of radical romance states that "It is often willing to abandon the emphasis on making sure the couple ends up together, regardless of likelihood, instead striving to interrogate the ideology of romance" (59). The movie applies to this theory because the entire movie is based on Julia Roberts as well as the four girls of Sex and they City, are pursuing the man, not the other way around; the generic way movies have been for decades before the radical romance comedies. Another aspect that gives the movie a radical twist is Julia Roberts’s character does not end up with the man in the end; she ends up dancing with a gay man. Both of those scenarios are extremely radical at this time because the 'happily every after' dream does not come true, and homosexuality was not very prevalent during this period.
For the most part romantic comedies are light hearted, and predominantly made for women; however they offer a sense of hope for those looking for love, and give commonality to those who are in love and can relate to the movie.
Both of these different movies offer parallelism and insight into a concept of radical romance for the female sex and gender. Even though these two movies represent different types of women, it allows the view to witness the commonalty that all women have; power to better themselves through themselves.



Barker, Chris. Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications. California. 2000.

Hogan, PJ. My Best Friends Wedding

McDonald, Tamar. Romantic Comedy: Boy Meets Girl Meets Genre. Wallflower press. London. 2007

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Sex and The City Group

I will be completely honest, I really despise group work. It always seems like one person in the group does the majority of the work, and the other members get to bask in the glory. However, when our group got together for the first time I was pleasantly surprised. Not only did I get to do an entire presentation on my favorite movie ever, I got to work with some amazing individuals. My group and I really bonded, and was able to hold great communication throughout the entire process. No one really tried to step on each other’s toes, and all of the work was divided evenly.
I was given the task of the introduction. Sex and The City was not only a movie it also had six seasons of the television series to take into consideration; and a lot of intricate characters that needed to be shaved down to a presentable length. It was also difficult to explain the dynamics to an audience that is not well aware of the series. I chose to emphasize the differences and commonality between the four women; their different careers yet, all four were very successful in their own right. Each of them had vibrant personalities from the girl next door to the one who enjoys sleeping around.
The appeal of the series is the bluntness that these four individual women have. Whether it is their obsession with fashion, men or their inner circle of friendship, it is a movie that allows the audience to slip into a fun and energetic movie.
I picked this clip to play because it was not only the opening scene of the movie, it also gave great insight and a brief history of each girl.


Another clip I picked we played at the end of the presentation. This was a clip from the very last season of the series, when Carrie is having her final thoughts. I felt that is was fitting because she says a great part about relationships and it ties into what we have discussed in class all semester. Over all I had a great time doing this presentation, and I have met some great friends!

Saturday, November 29, 2008

Cyberspace!!

The internet, and what is represents, is a little overwhelming at times. I will be the first to
admit, that my generation has a massive reliance on the contraption. It has become the
eye of the tornado that has created a generation that is socially awkward because they
do not know how to communicate without the screen in front of them. It is perplexing to
read Barker's chapter when he refers to the current generation as the "has been an
ideological signifier charged with utopian images of the future" (409). I agree with this
statement because the youth holds the power of the internet in the palm of their hands.
They are constantly using it for positive things like research for homework, and the
internet is a great learnig tool if used properly. However, one thing that annoys me is
when 13 year olds are on myspace. Why in the world do they need to be on there? It
makes me laugh becasue they have this little community and they chat and comment
each others pictures; yet they see each other at school five days a week.
The internet is a double ended sword. It has opened society into a whole new world, with
the ability to see different cultures and gaining new knowledge. However, it is such a
negative tool because of the aspect of identity theft and even internet predators, just to
name a few. But I guess you have to take the bad with the good....

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Five Minutes of Film

St. Augustine once wrote “Love is a temporary madness. It erupts like an earthquake and then subsides. And when it subsides you have to make a decision. You have to work out whether your roots have become so entwined together that it is inconceivable that you should ever part. Because this is what love is. Love is not breathlessness, it is not excitement, it is not the promulgation of promises of eternal passion. That is just being "in love" which any of us can convince ourselves we are.” This quote embodies the true nature of the relationship between the two characters of The Notebook. The Most Romantic Five minutes of film goes to the Notebook for the raw honesty and compassion that these two people have for one another. No
ah and Allie faced many tribulations of their separate beings in order to unite as one. There was a massive class and economic differences between the two, however it did not matter; they only cared about each other. This scene shows the intricate web being woven to show the dynamic characteristics and organic feelings between Noah and Allie, no matter the circumstances.

Monday, October 13, 2008

Response Paper

Shawna Powell
My Best Friends Wedding
As stated in Tamar McDonald’s book, Romantic Comedy: Boy Meets Girl Meets Genre, romantic comedies are viewed as guilty pleasures. When analyzing a certain genre of movie, like a romantic comedy, there are certain elements that need to be addressed and will offer a proper structure to the film. As I began analyzing one of my favorite romantic comedies, My Best Friends Wedding, deciphering the elements of the genre were much easy to witness with the new found knowledge I have obtained.
In the earlier sentences of the chapter of Romantic Comedies, McDonald states that “(Romantic Comedies) Satisfy because they provide easy, uncomplicated pleasures” (McDonald: 7). When I would watch a movie, I never realized that I enjoyed them immensely because they came with no urge to use my brain cells. As I sat down to watch a classic Julia Roberts movie, I recognized that it fits into that mold; the mold of the generic love story that has been done once, twice, a million times.
The film is centered on Julianne Potter (Julia Roberts), a 27-year-old New York restaurant critic who receives a call from her long-time friend Michael O'Neal .In College, the two made an agreement that if neither of them were married by the time they turned 28, they would marry each other. Three weeks before her 28th birthday, Michael tells her he has fallen in love with and is about to marry a 20-year-old college student from a wealthy family. This causes Julianne to realize she has always been in love with Michael and cannot stand to see him wed another woman.
McDonald further states that another element of a romantic comedy is there will always be visual characteristics. These characteristics are identifiable in most movies and create a symbol for the particular genre. He states that “Consider the reception within the genre of articles associated with weddings, as well as chocolates, candlelight, beds…” (11). Having a movie’s setting placed predominantly around a wedding shows that love and romance is the main plot; it is a subconscious facet that love is saturated in some aspect throughout the entire movie.
One aspect that doesn’t really match up with McDonald theory is “Romantic comedies are boy meets, loses, regains girl” (12). In this particular movie, boy does meet and loose girl, however it is the girl that attempts to regain boy. As stated earlier, the plot revolves Julia Roberts going to profess her undying love to her ex-boyfriend in hopes to break up his wedding. Although it does not fit the perfect mold, there is the same structure just switched sexes at the end.
Everyone wants to have hoped that someday they soon will find true love. Perhaps that is the lure of romantic comedies; they offer the insight and fantasy of finding your soul mate but is it realistic? McDonald says that “In giving the audience a high degree of closure with the happy ending in films of this genre, are romantic comedies benign, supplying an on-screen fantasy of perpetual bliss usually lacking in real life?” (14). One aspect I enjoyed about My Best Friend’s Wedding is the movie did not end up in the usual fairy tale happy ending. When Julia Roberts character finally musters up enough courage to tell Michael how much she wants to be with him, the audience feels like it will end up the “normal” way. However, Michael ends up marrying his 20-something fiancĂ©, leaving Julia Roberts embarrassed and alone; which doesn’t happen normally. I really liked that even though she didn’t end up with her “prince”, she still stood up for what she believed in and she received closure.
Another aspect that needs to be considered is that My Best Friends Wedding is quite radical. The definition of radical romance states that "It is often willing to abandon the empahsis on making sure the couple ends up together, regardless of likelihood, instead striving to interrogate the ideology of romance" (59). The movie applies to this theory because the entire movie is based on Julia Roberts pursuing the man, not the other way around; the generic way movies have been for decades before the radical romance comedies. Another aspect that gives the movie a radical twist is Julia Roberts character does not end up with the man in the end; she ends up dancing with a gay man. Both of those scenarios are extremly radical at this time becasue the 'happily every after' dream does not come true, and homosexuality was not very prevalent during this period.
For the most part romantic comedies are light hearted, and predominantly made for women; however they offer a sense of hope for those looking for love, and give commonality to those who are in love and can relate to the movie. My Best Friends Wedding has most of the aspects that allows it to be placed in the romantic comedy genre; however it also meets the criteria to be a radical romance as well. And who doesn’t love Rupert Evert sing “I’ll Say A Little Pray for You” ?


Works Cited:

Hogan, PJ. My Best Friends Wedding

McDonald, Tamar. Romantic Comedy: Boy Meets Girl Meets Genre. Wallflower press. London. 2007

shasha82186@msn.com

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Ethnography

Ha, that's ironic! Like some of my peers, I work in a restaurant/bar that is located on Santa Monica Boulevard, so there is a massive variety and diversity of people that come through the restaurant. I wanted to observe the patrons with the knowledge I have received from class; like woman as a second sex.I work at nights a lot, so I have so many observations I could write a novel; but I will keep it short and sweet.One of the couples that came in last night really made me happy. It was a really pretty woman, in her late 20’s and her boyfriend who was similar in age. They were dressed like it was a “date night” and they seemed like they genuinely enjoyed each others company. I sat them outside and he got up to use the restroom. She was sitting there by herself on her phone, and the minute he walked back outside, she looked up and her face lit up, sincerely excited to see him; even though he was away for five minutes! It made me think of Beauvoir’s article as Woman as the Second Sex. Did this girl really love this man, or was she relying on him? If the situation was switched, and the girl left briefly and walked back in- would the boy smile that big like she did? When he walked in, did he feel superior because she was sitting there waiting for him? Am I reading too much into this??Working in West Hollywood allows me to connect with the gay community- and I love them! So during observation it is inevitable that gay romance would be included. We have a lot of regulars, so I know which guy is more feminine or the girl, and the manlier one of the couple. One couple in particular came in the other night, and I watched there interaction more closely. They are a very, very good looking couple, always dressed to the nines and always really affectionate. They took a seat at the bar, and both harmlessly flirted with our bartender, and then settled into the stool. As the evening wore on, they were always touching somehow- whether it was a playful nudge, or a hand on the shoulder. They also were always laughing. In my eyes, laughter is always a sign of a good, healthy relationship. Even though you are dealing with two men, Beauvoir’s article can still be witnessed. It is easy to see which man is “the other”. It might not be his body parts that set him apart from the other, it is body language. Man 1, was always the initiator, always wanting to be noticed and needed; much like women can be. Man 2 paid for the drinks, and would respond to what Man 1 was initiating. It was quite interesting witnessing the theories we’ve been discussing in class for the past few weeks come to life.

Everyday is a Hollyday

I was so excited that Breakfast at Tiffany's was assigned; this is one of my favorite
books. I really enjoy the complexities of Holly Golightly and she is an embodiment of
what we have been discussing in class. Holly is a radical woman, especially in the time
frame that this story was written. She is portratyed to always be in the company of men;
not always sexually but they are always in her presence. Is it that she is "the other", or
is she in control of the situation? I think she is in control, and is impowered by her raw
sexuality. She has the basic instincts to use her beauty and sexuality to take care of
herself financially. She visits Sing Sing every Thursday to support herself; some call it
prostitution, I call it survival.
I enjoy the novella over the movie, because the book protrays Ms.Golightly in a powerful
and in control atmosphere; the movie makes her appear almost naive and flighty.